Microteaching, a pedagogical tool initially developed for teacher education, has found its firm foothold in medical education training programs. This narrative review highlights its pivotal role, merits, demerits, and practical implications, particularly in postgraduate evaluations. Emphasizing lesson planning, presentation skills, and effective use of audiovisual aids, microteaching facilitates a deeper understanding of the teaching process and its complexities. Various studies have demonstrated its positive impact on teacher knowledge growth, confidence-bilding, and skill retention, while also promoting problem-solving, critical thinking, and reflective teaching. Beyond the health sciences, it is proven effective in subjects like mathematics. However, challenges persist, with time constraints during sessions and potential administrative bottlenecks when managing large classes. Despite these limitations, the importance of preparing postgraduate candidates for microteaching evaluations is undeniable, requiring a comprehensive understanding and practice of the core skills. The review concludes by advocating for a more widespread adoption and adaptation of microteaching techniques, particularly in regions like India, where its potential remains under-tapped.
Elliot J. A microteaching experiment at MEDUNSA. S Afr Med J 1982;62:868–870. PMID: 7147122.
Singh LC, Sharma RD. New Delhi: Department of Teacher Education NCERT; 1987. Micro-teaching–Theory and Practice.
Chen Q, Zeng F, Yang Z. Study on the effects of multimedia monitoring system in medical teacher's microteaching training. Comput Inf Sci 2010;3:241–243. DOI: 10.5539/cis.v3n2p241.
I'Anson J, Rodrigues S, Wilson G. Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice. Eur J Teach Educ 2003;26:189–99.
MacLeod G. Microteaching in Teacher Education. In: Anderson LW, editor. International Encyclopaedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1995. pp. 573–577.
Ananthakrishnan N. Microteaching as a vehicle of teacher training – Its advantages and disadvantages. J Postgrad Med 1993;39:142–143. PMID: 8051644.
D'Eon M, Kalyani PK, Sean P. “Teaching Improvement Project Systems Facilitators: Ms Deirdre Bonny castle” 2011. Available from: http://www.upstate.edu/com/about/campuses/bing/documents/upstate_tips_for_faculty.pdf.
Anshu D, Singh R, Narang P. Introducing microteaching sessions in an Indian medical school. Med Educ 2009;43:1087–1088. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03493.x.
Benton-Kupper J. The microteaching experience: Student Perspectives Education. Summer 2001;121:830–835. Corpus ID: 141442752.
Remesh A. Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. J Res Med Sci 2013;18(2):158–163. PMID: 23914219.
Applebee AN. Microteaching, component skills and the training of teachers, an evaluation of a research and development project. Br J Educ Technol 1976;7:35–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1976.tb00354.x.
Amobi FA, Irwin L. Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers’ reflection on teaching actions, Fresh perspective on an established practice. J Scholarsh Teach Learn 2009;9:27–34.
Can V. A microteaching application on a teaching practice course. Cypriot J EducSci 2009;4:125–140.
Harden RM, Crosby JR. The good teacher is more than a lecturer – The twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach 2000;22:334–347. DOI: 10.1080/014215900409429.
Singh T. Microteaching revisited. Natl Med J India 2011;24:363–364. PMID: 22680264.