Bengal Physician Journal

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

EXPERT OPINION

Rational Deprescribing Practices in Elderly Patients: An Expert Opinion

Shambo S Samajdar, Nandini Chatterjee, Jyotirmoy Pal, Melvin George, Sougata Sarkar, Sumalya Sen, Shatavisa Mukherjee, Shashank R Joshi, Sanjay Bandyopadhyay, Shailendra Handu, Santanu K Tripathi, Arvind Mathur, Meenaxi Sharda

Keywords : Deprescribing, Expert opinion, Geriatric care, India, Patient safety, Polypharmacy

Citation Information : Samajdar SS, Chatterjee N, Pal J, George M, Sarkar S, Sen S, Mukherjee S, Joshi SR, Bandyopadhyay S, Handu S, Tripathi SK, Mathur A, Sharda M. Rational Deprescribing Practices in Elderly Patients: An Expert Opinion. Bengal Physician Journal 2024; 11 (3):133-145.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10070-8072

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-12-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: The prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in India is a growing concern, particularly among the elderly. With over 49% of the elderly population engaged in polypharmacy and 31% in hyperpolypharmacy, the resultant issues of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are increasingly evident. These medications, often unnecessary, can lead to severe adverse effects, diminishing the quality of life for a significant portion of this demographic. Addressing these issues is imperative for enhancing healthcare outcomes and necessitates the development of deprescribing guidelines that cater specifically to the Indian healthcare context. Objective: This opinion aims to provide a structured approach to deprescribing, targeting the minimization of risks associated with unnecessary medication use among the elderly in India. The primary goal is to establish evidence-based, practical guidelines adaptable to diverse healthcare settings across the country, ensuring both safety and efficacy in medication management. Methods: The development of this opinion involved a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach, incorporating inputs from clinical pharmacologists, geriatricians, internal medicine experts, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, pharmacists, and patient advocacy groups. An expert panel was formed to conduct extensive literature reviews, ensuring a robust evidence base for the opinion development. Consensus meetings were held to harmonize expert opinions and integrate clinical practices with empirical evidence. Pilot testing in various healthcare settings, both urban and rural, was crucial for evaluating the practicality and effectiveness of the guidelines. Feedback from these tests was used to refine the guidelines further, ensuring their relevance and applicability across different regions and healthcare systems within India. Results: The opinion outlines a systematic approach to deprescribing, including the identification of PIMs through validated tools like the Beers and STOPP/START criteria. They emphasize the importance of assessing individual patient risks, such as drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, before initiating any changes to medication regimens. A key component is the implementation of a patient-centered care model, emphasizing shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients. This approach is expected to foster better patient engagement and compliance. The anticipated impact of these guidelines includes a reduction in adverse drug events, increased medication adherence, and overall improvement in the health and well-being of the elderly population. Conclusion: The opinions presented are poised to transform prescribing practices across India by reducing unnecessary medication use among the elderly. By focusing on evidence-based interventions, patient-specific considerations, and collaborative care approaches, these guidelines are expected to mitigate the risks associated with polypharmacy and enhance the quality of life for older adults. The successful implementation of these guidelines requires ongoing education and support for healthcare providers, as well as regular updates based on emerging evidence and clinical outcomes.


PDF Share
  1. Bhagavathula AS, Vidyasagar K, Chhabra M, et al. Prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. front pharmacol 2021;12:685518. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.685518.
  2. Samajdar SS, Das S, Sarkar S, et al. Association between polypharmacy and cardiovascular autonomic function among elderly patients in an urban municipality area of Kolkata, India: A record-based cross-sectional study. Geriatrics (Basel) 2022;7(6):136. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics7060136.
  3. Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian SV. Health care and equity in India. Lancet 2011;377(9764):505–515. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10) 61894-6.
  4. Porter G, Grills N. Medication misuse in India: A major public health issue in India. Journal of Public Health 2016;38(2):e150–e157. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv072.
  5. Chandy SJ, Thomas K, Mathai E, et al. Patterns of antibiotic use in the community and challenges of antibiotic surveillance in a lower-middle-income country setting: A repeated cross-sectional study in Vellore, South India. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68(1):229–236.
  6. Salunkhe SD, Pandit VA, Dawane JS, et al. Study of over the counter sale of antimicrobials in pharmacy outlets in Pune, India: A cross sectional study. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2013;4(2):616–622.
  7. Rathnakar UP, Sharma NK, Garg R, et al. A Study on the sale of antimicrobial agents without prescriptions in pharmacies in an urban area in South India. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research 2012;6(6):951–954. [online] Available from: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/pdf/2308/7%20-%204511_E(C)_PF1(R)_F(P)_PF(V)_PFA(P)_PF(R)_U(P).pdf.
  8. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2007;5(4):345–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.12.002.
  9. Basu S, Chatterjee M, Chandra PK, et al. Antibiotic misuse in children by the primary care physicians – An Indian experience. Niger J Clin Pract 2008;11(1):52–57. PMID: 18689140.
  10. Hopcroft P, Peel NM, Poudel A, et al. Prescribing for older people discharged from the acute sector to residential aged-care facilities. Intern Med J 2014;44(10):1034–1037. DOI: 10.1111/imj.12553.
  11. Todd A, Holmes HM. Recommendations to support deprescribing medications late in life. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37(5):678–681. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0148-6.
  12. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023;71(7):2052–2081. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18372.
  13. O'Mahony D, Cherubini A, Guiteras AR, et al. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: Version 3. Eur Geriatr Med 2023;14(4):625–632. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y.
  14. Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: The process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:827–834. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324.
  15. Samajdar SS, Tripathi SK. Clinical pharmacological reconciliation, review, and feedback in ensuring patient safety: A Commentary. J Clin Pharmacol 2023;63(9):1074–1075. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2285.
  16. Samajdar SS, Mukherjee S, Sarkar S, et al. Clinical pharmacological consultation in optimizing diabetic patient care: A cross-sectional observational study. Bengal Physician Journal 2023;10(1):6–8. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10070-8006.
  17. Anderson K, Stowasser D, Freeman C, et al. Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMJ Open 2014;4(12):e006544. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006544.
  18. Samajdar SS, Mukherjee S, Tripathi SK, et al. Deprescribing for better patient outcomes in chronic long term care and role of clinical pharmacological review. J Assoc Physicians India 2021;69(11):11–12. PMID: 34781620.
  19. Nishtala PS, Salahudeen MS, Hilmer SN. Anticholinergics: Theoretical and clinical overview. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016;15(6):753–768. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1165664.
  20. Saha D, Samajdar SS, Begum SA, et al. Anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients attending clinical pharmacology clinic—A descriptive cross-sectional study in Eastern India. J Indian Med Assoc 2022;120(10):39–43.
  21. Taipale HT, Bell JS, Soini H, et al. Sedative load and mortality among residents of long-term care facilities: A prospective cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(10):871–881. DOI: 10.2165/11317080-000000000-00000.
  22. Onder G, Petrovic M, Tangiisuran B, et al. Development and validation of a score to assess risk of adverse drug reactions among in-hospital patients 65 years or older: The GerontoNet ADR risk score. Arch Intern Med 2010;170(13):1142–1148. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed. 2010.153.
  23. Endsley S. Deprescribing unnecessary medications: A four-part process. Fam Pract Manag 2018;25(3):28–32.
  24. Iyer S, Naganathan V, McLachlan AJ, et al. Medication withdrawal trials in people aged 65 years and older: A systematic review. Drugs Aging 2008;25(12):1021–1031. DOI: 10.2165/0002512-200825120-00004.
  25. Mistler LA, Mellman TA, Drake RE. A pilot study testing a medication algorithm to reduce polypharmacy. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18(1):55–58. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024471.
  26. Scott IA, Gray LC, Martin JH, et al. Minimizing inappropriate medications in older populations: A 10-step conceptual framework. Am J Med 2012;125(6):529–537.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.021.
  27. Samajdar SS, Mukherjee S, Sharma J, et al. Clinical pharmacological reconciliation, review, and feedback in elderly care: A transformative approach. J Indian Acad Geriatr 2024;20(3):150–153. DOI: 10.4103/jiag.jiag_31_24.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.